In May and June of last year I wrote a series of posts (53 Transcripts) after reading the nearly 6,000 pages of testimony given to the House Intelligence Committee in 2017 and early 2018 regarding alleged Russian interference with the 2016 presidential election. This testimony had been suppressed for nearly a year and a half by Representative Adam Schiff after the Democrats seized control of the House because it debunked their theories of Trump collusion with the Russians and exposed Rep Schiff as a serial liar. I recently discovered one last post that mistakenly was left in draft form and wanted to post it to complete the series.
Before doing so a couple of summary comments on what has proven to be the Russian Collusion Hoax and the greatest political scandal in American history; a concerted attempt to remove an elected President by the opposition party, entrenched federal bureaucrats and supported by supposedly non-partisan media. The post Election Tampering sums up my views and you can read all the Russia Collusion posts here.
I initially thought there might be something to the allegations regarding Trump based on his own statements during the campaign and after the election. I was wrong.(1)
There were two pillars upon which the investigation rested. The first was the Steele Dossier, which proved to be a creation of the Clinton campaign and Russian intelligence, a fact so embarrassing to the Mueller investigation that all mention of the dossier was excised from the collusion section of its final report. The second was the March 2016 conversation between Professor Joseph Mifsud and junior Trump foreign policy wannabe George Papadopolous. What was said remains in dispute. Mifsud, interviewed by the FBI in February 2017, denied making any statements regarding Russian possession of damaging information regarding Hillary Clinton and the Mueller team never charged Mifsud with making a false statement. What appears to be the case as of now is that Mifsud was not a Russian intelligence asset and not working for the FBI. But what was he? If, as I suspect he was tasked by a friendly foreign intelligence service to approach Papadopolous it puts an entirely different light on the beginnings of this affair. I hope that Special Counsel John Durham's investigation will reveal whatever the truth is about Mifsud. For more background on Mifsud see Footnote 2 of this post.
Looking back it is also revealing the depths to which the Democrats and their allies stooped to conspiracy mongering. Just as we have QAnon, we also have what some have aptly referred to as BlueAnon, and the Russian Collusion Hoax was the starting point for an unending wave of conspiracy theories from the Left.
Russian Collusion was a conspiracy theory and it had many sub-components. As a reminder here are some of them (ones I wrote about as part of the 53 Transcript series are in bold):
Carter Page as key link in collusion
Trump Tower Meeting
Trump Tower Moscow
Miss Universe Moscow and the "salacious allegations" (Fake news, but relevant because Russians.)
Russian Financiers of Trump Org (except there weren't any, but relevant because Russians)
Russian Condo Buyers (after Trump Tower was built, which contains condos separate from the office space, some of the original condo purchasers resold their unit to Russian buyers. The Trump Organization was not involved but somehow this was relevant because Russians.)
Russian Buying Florida Mansion (Trump bought a Florida mansion and sold it a few years later to a Russian and made tens of millions. Relevant because Russians.)Deutsche Bank (so stupid even the D's on the Intelligence Committee gave up on this one.)
Alfa Bank (Russian owned bank with its servers allegedly connected directly with Trump Org. Fake news, but relevant because Russians)
Ukraine Plank on GOP Platform
Paul Manafort. (Supposed co-mastermind behind it all. Not. Targeted by Ukrainians working with Hillary Campaign in 2016).
Michael Flynn & The Ruskies (this one completely fell apart with revelations later in 2020)
The Hacks (DNC, DCCC, John Podesta)
Wikileaks (Bumbling clowns Roger Stone and Jerome Corsi try to get info from Assange but fail).
Michael Cohen in Prague. (And, according to Steele Dossier, co-mastermind with Manafort of collusion. I was surprised and impressed with Cohen's testimony - precise, knows the real estate world, impassioned rebuttal of the Steele Dossier, and refused to be pushed around by Schiff and Swalwell.)
Cambridge Analytica. (Bad because it used data from Facebook, unlike the Obama people in 2012 who were good because they used data from Facebook. More recent information indicates this was a phony story from the start).
This doesn't even include the continuing barrage of "fake news" stories from major media outlets. For three examples just from one week in December 2017 read Footnote 4 from this post.
Real Estate Promoters
The Democrats on the Intelligence Committee were fixated on the attempt to build a Trump Tower in Moscow based on a complete misunderstanding of how the Trump Organization operated and developed and financed its projects.
There were two primary witnesses on this subject, Felix Sater and long-time Trump Organization lawyer Michael Cohen.
"I was born in 1966 in Moscow, Soviet Union, with the word 'Jew" stamped on my passport under nationality, not Russian, as has been reported about me".
"Guys, I'm a real estate promoter. Until the bank writes the check, it's all salesmanship and promotion to try to get many, many parties towards the center to try to get the deal done."
Reading this in light of the Trump presidency and, in particular, the debacle he created between the 2020 election and the inauguration, it is clear how much of Trump's political strategy derived from his real estate experience. The Trump projects were transactional and one-time events. Each stood alone. Trump never had to think about longer-term strategy and it hampered him as President. After the election he employed his real estate techniques, making outlandish and insupportable statements about election fraud, specifically the Dominion software allegations. He simply didn't care if they were true or not as long as he got enough of his supporters to believe they were. He would say anything, regardless of longer-term consequences, if it could get him the deal.
"I had a concern both that if we won and the project couldn't move forward, because maybe he couldn't do it as the President . . . or if he lost and the other side would lose interest in financing it".
"What Mr Sater is is a salesman, and he uses very colorful language".
No comments:
Post a Comment